No, the only piece we've really been using so far is the enhancer. My interest in the contenthub and cmsadapter is cursory at this point. I was actually just going through the Stanbol docs reading up on some of the other pieces, and was thinking about playing around with them a bit to see if we might have a use for them.
I'll grab that 0.12 branch to work with that stuff for now. If I do wind up finding a good use for either piece, I'll post a follow-up here. Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > I'm curious about your usecase for Contenthub and CMS Adapter. Did you > actually use them in real life? > > Cheers, > Reto > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Phillip Rhodes > <motley.crue....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Stanbol crew: >> >> I had pulled down the Stanbol source some time ago, performed a build >> and was using >> that Stanbol. I made the mistake(?) of doing an "svn up" last night, >> without having >> been real active following this list the past few months, and now I'm >> surprised to see that >> the contenthub and cmsadapter directories appear to be missing. >> >> Could someone who is "in the know" give me a quick review of what the >> state of those modules is? I scanned back through the archives, but >> didn't find a concise summary of what was going on there. Are those >> gone, never to return, or just being moved, or being replaced with >> something else, or "other"? >> >> In the meantime, I'll be working back through the list archives, but >> if somebody would be kind enough to help me catch up, it would be much >> appreciated. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Phil >> >> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >>
