It's also interesting to see the synaptic web that Dominiek talks about in his blog post. I think it's more into streaming of data and without semantic web, you cannot extract meaningful information/semantics from those data streams..
Why do you think this? I assume there is slower moving and faster moving information. Large streams and smaller streams. So this would depend on technology and resources. I think there is another important dimension to this. You use the word 'meaningful' but this issue is what is meaningful and how long does it remain meaningful. Meaningful should mean some organising principal based upon which actions are taken. That organising principal could be a financial profit point. That does not cover all dimensions of meaning though. Quickly judgements have to be made as to what is truly of profit to people, or at least what may be of profit, aside from financial motivations. What I'm pointing out is that the latter is an indifferent and blind driver. Adam On Thursday, November 14, 2013, Dileepa Jayakody wrote: > Very nice blog post. > It captures the main functions of semantic web and linked data. > IMO Semantic web is a paradigm and not a set of technologies. It's a set of > concepts to extract meaningful information/semantics and relationships from > analyzing related documents. (after all WWW is a collection of related > documents) > > It's also interesting to see the synaptic web that Dominiek talks about in > his blog post. > I think it's more into streaming of data and without semantic web, you > cannot extract meaningful information/semantics from those data streams.. > > I'm really interested about your concept on combining data sources: email, > facebook, linkedin and other SNSs to do semantic analysis. I'm doing my MSc > research on email reputation management which requires semantic analysis of > email data. > Please share more info, links about those topics if you have. > > > Thanks, > Dileepa > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Phillip Rhodes > <motley.crue....@gmail.com <javascript:;>>wrote: > > > Hey guys, I thought some of you might find this interesting and/or have > > some > > insightful feedback. I just wrote a blog post responding to a guy who > said > > "the semantic web has failed", and I cited Stanbol as part of my > > explanation of > > why he's wrong. > > > > > http://fogbeam.blogspot.com/2013/11/dominiek-ter-heide-is-dead-wrong.html > > > > I also say that I think Stanbol might be the most important OSS > > project of all, which is something I believe may well be true. > > Anyway, any feedback or comments are appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Phil > > > > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > > >
