Hi Benjamin, Reto

>  the web and engine bundles can not (log messages:
> https://gist.github.com/groe/208536f121ea562e1d09).
[..]
> visiting http://localhost:8080/topic we only get this error
> message: https://gist.github.com/groe/d0acf569ec719947ee89

Looks like as if the web module of the TopicEngine is not yet
converted to the new commons-web (of the trunk). @Reto can you confirm
this?

In that case I would recommend you to use the stable "release-0.12"
branch [1] instead.

> However all the
> default chains seem to create Text-/TopicAnnotations only but not a
> single TopicAnnotation

The TopicEngine is not included by default. This is mainly because
Stanbol does currently not come with an pre-trained model. To use the
Engine you will need to install the additional bundles.

But even without an pre-trained model there is IMO no reason why the
TopicEngine should not be included in the default launcher(s) of for
the 0.12 release. I will create an according issue and perform the
required changes in the launcher configurations.

>  the topic engine now seems to be splitted up in 3 parts
> (api, web and engine).

Correct. This split was done as part of STANBOL-1142 [2]

best
Rupert


[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/branches/release-0.12/
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1142

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Benjamin Grössing
<e1025...@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently working on an open source project and we would like to
> use Stanbol in order to find matching keywords/topics for web sites
> (i.e. content classification). However, we are having some troubles
> setting up Stanbol in the right way - maybe someone here could help
> us?
>
> What we have done so far: Build and start stanbol from SVN trunk
> according to the "Getting Started Tutorial" and do some quick
> enhancement queries - which works perfectly fine (after updating the
> maven config to use maven-shade 2.1 instead of 2.0 - there seems to be
> an incompatibility with maven 3.1.1 otherwise). However all the
> default chains seem to create Text-/TopicAnnotations only but not a
> single TopicAnnotation (which would be the kind of annotation which
> would fit our needs best, if I understand the docs correctly).
>
> So we found the topic engine
> (http://www.iks-project.eu/sites/default/files/Topic-Classification.pdf)
> and tried to install it. However, we encountered a few problems with
> that:
> -) The paths mentioned in the docs (see PDF link) are a little
> different and the topic engine now seems to be splitted up in 3 parts
> (api, web and engine). Okay, so we installed all three of them.
> -) While the topic API bundle can be started, the web and engine
> bundles can not (log messages:
> https://gist.github.com/groe/208536f121ea562e1d09). So, the packages
> "javax.ws.rs..." and "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.topic" seem to be
> missing. We tried some things to get that to work as well (like
> removing this from the pom.xml of the engine bundle:
> https://gist.github.com/groe/1bb119dc7e04ae29b40e and adding
> "jsr311-api" as a maven dependency for the javax.ws.rs package), and
> eventually all three bundles were installed (although not sure if
> correctly).
> -) With everything installed we have created the topic engine
> configuration (as described in the PDF). But when visiting
> http://localhost:8080/topic we only get this error message:
> https://gist.github.com/groe/d0acf569ec719947ee89
>
> Now we don't know what else we can try. Is this an actual (known?)
> problem with the topic engine? Is it still maintained at all? Any
> chances of getting it to run?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Regards
> Benjamin Groessing



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to