Content:
Barclays has appointed Shaygan Kheradpir to the role of Chief Operations
and Technology Officer. He will join the Executive Committee of Barclays
and report directly to Group Chief Executive Antony Jenkins.

Above content doesn't identify* Barclays* as an organization by
identifies *Executive
Committee of Barclays* as an organization.

How can we improve the accuracy of these results?

Thanks,
Dileepa


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <dileepajayak...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> [Typo corrected in the subject of the mail]
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dileepa Jayakody <dileepajayak...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:40 PM
> Subject: How to refinin NER results in Stanbol
> To: Stanbol Dev List <dev@stanbol.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have been running some load tests on Stanbol entity recognition, with a
> high load of content extracted from web articles and stored in a Solr index.
>
> My objective is to achieve an efficient and accurate enhancement result
> for the content submitted.
>
> But I think some of the NER results obtained are not accurate.
>
> For an example I submit the content :
> Group Finance Director Chris Lucas and Group General Counsel Mark Harding
> to retire from Barclays
>
> I get below entity recognition results from default enhancement-chain;
>
> People : Chris Lucas, Mark Harding
> Organization: Barclays, *BT Group*, *Finance Director Chris Lucas and
> Group General Counsel*
>
> The highlighted NERs for organizations above are inaccurate results.
> BT Group is not mentioned in the content, and the result : *Finance
> Director Chris Lucas and Group General Counsel * is not an organization,
> rather a phrase.
> Further if I add a fullstop (.) to the end of the sentence "Barclays" is
> not recognized as an Organization.
>
> I think we need to improve these results in Stanbol NER. Can we tweak
> OpenNLP-NER component for this?
>
> Any ideas/pointers on how to refine these enhancement results will be
> immensely helpful.
> I'm looking for a way to improve the accuracy of the results as much as
> possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Dileepa
>
>

Reply via email to