Hi Dileepa, Thank you so much for your valuble feedback. I'm working on this.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <dileepajayak...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Jayani, > > There are several enhancement engines in Stanbol developed based on > OpenNLP. (opennlp-ner, opennlp-sentence, opennlp-pos...See [1]) Each of > these engines focus on a particular enhancement aspect using OpenNLP. > Therefore I think it's better to write a new engine for temporal > extractions rather than extending the OpenNLP-NER engine. > > Thanks, > Dileepa > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/trunk/enhancement-engines/opennlp > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jayani Withanawasam < > jayaniwithanawa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm researching on adding new enhancement engine for extracting date and > > time (Temporal extraction) to Stanbol as suggested by Rupert. > > > > There, it is being found that OpenNLP has an entity extraction unit for > > date and time. > > Also, I noticed that OpenNLP is already integrated to Stanbol in NER > > engine. > > > > So, as per my understanding, there are two options to extract date and > > time. > > > > One is to have a seperate enhancement engine for date and time > information > > extraction. Another one is to add date time extraction as a code > > enhancement to exisitng OpenNLP NER engine. > > > > What is your opinion on this? Is there any other approach which you think > > that would be better? > > > > Thank you > > Jayani > > >
