Hi all,

In the last few weeks there was not much progress on this.Starting
with next week I should have time to work on that and hopefully get it
out before Christmas!

But before continuing I would like to ask for opinions on some
decisions we need to take:

1. Module Versions: Currently different Stanbol Component do use
different module versions: Commons: 0.12.0-SNAPSHOT; Enhancer:
0.11.0-SNAPSHOT; Enhancement Engines: 0.10.1-SNAPSHOT; Entityhub:
0.12.0-SNAPSHOT; all others components: 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT and finally
all launchers and Bundlelists use 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT

IMO we should update all those versions to 0.12.0 before the release.
Even that this will require to manually set the OSGI version ranges
for a lot of modules.

A light weight variant would be to only update the version numbers of
the bundle lists and launchers and keep the current version numbers
for all the other modules.

2. Add release-able Launchers: As most will know, we can not make
binary releases of the current launchers, as they would include
artifacts that are not compatible with the ASL (e..g the OpenNLP Model
files). Because of that I would suggest to add Launchers that do not
include such modules (meaning that they do not include a default
configuration) and provide binary releases of Stanbol Launchers with
the 0.12.0 release.

3. IMO we should keep the 0.12.0 branch active even after a release
and back port compatible features and bug fixes. This is mainly
because there will be several major changes in the trunk version and
so it will mostly be good to provide fixes and improvements for users
that require a more stable version.

I have done this already for a lot of uIssues in the last few weeks
and IMO the overhead of doing so is reasonable.

4. Set up a Jenkins build for the 0.12.0 branch: As this is considered
the "stable" version it would be good to have Jenkins builds for this.

best
Rupert

-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to