Hi all FYI: With r1571151 [1] the release-0.12 brach was upgraded to 0.12.1-SNAPSHOT. There is also an according version in JIRA. The 0.12.0 release will be created by using the apache-stanbol-0.12 tag [2].
best Rupert [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1571151 [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-0.12/ On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Fabian, all, > > with STANBOL-1276 implemented and some other minor commits mainly > concerning noisy INFO level logging I am done with all my planed > changes for the 0.12.0 release. > > best > Rupert > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler > <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Fabian, >> >> Friday is very good for me, as I will be offline the whole day ^^ >> >> So lets define that 0.12 is frozen starting from Fr Feb. 7th 00:00 GMT >> until after the release was cut and voted. >> >> best >> Rupert >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Fabian Christ >> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> no Problem Rupert - I will reflect the latest changes. I did some >>> attempts to cut the release and already created a release tag but I >>> also need to commit a few changes. >>> >>> Anyway - a code freeze date would be a good idea for the 0.12 branch. >>> This would be the deadline for creating a release tag from the branch. >>> What date would you suggest? This Friday, Feb 7th? >>> >>> Best, >>> - Fabian >>> >>> 2014-02-04 Rupert Westenthaler <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi (again), >>>> >>>> FYI, I did an other bug fixing commit [1] for STANBOL-1275 to the 0.12 >>>> branch >>>> >>>> best >>>> Rupert >>>> >>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1564363 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Westenthaler >>>> <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>> >>>>> I have only today noticed that you have already remove the SNAPSHOT >>>>> from the modules. Should we consider the 0.12.0 branch as frozen? >>>>> >>>>> Before that I made a commit [1] fixing STANBOL-1272 and also marked >>>>> this issue as fixed in 0.12.0. >>>>> >>>>> So if this commit does not make it into this release, I would need to >>>>> update the issue. >>>>> >>>>> best >>>>> Rupert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/r1563781 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Rupert Westenthaler >>>>> <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Christ >>>>>> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks Rupert for having a look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1182 also resolved? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> yep. Forgot to close ... done >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Rupert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> - Fabian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-01-31 Rupert Westenthaler <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Fabian Christ >>>>>>>> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there are two unresolved issues marked for the 0.12 release in JIRA. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1139 >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1254 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This does not affect 0.12 anymore as I have reverted the changes with >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1559065 and reto has reverted the change with >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/r1560050 in trunk. So I closed this one with >>>>>>>> resolution won't fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IMO we can go for the 0.12 release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>> Rupert >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could these issues be postponed, i.e. ignored for the 0.12 release, or >>>>>>>>> what is their status? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> - Fabian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabian >>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >> >> >> >> -- >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
