Hi Sergio, all IMO this would be a good move. In the last time I spent already a lot of time in merging things between 0.12 and the trunk and using git should make this a lot easier to handle.
best Rupert On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > Hi Stanbolers, > > this is not the first time I put this on the table of the community, but the > discussion never went further... But now 0.1.20 release is out, I think is a > good time to refresh it. > > I'm not sure what others think, but personally I find so inconvenient that > Stanbol still uses svn as scm (in fact it's the only project where I use it > at the momemnt). Switching to a dvcs would bring many possibilities > currently we do not have, specially now that we have to keep the 0.12.x > long-term maintenance branch. > > Actually the svn is already being mirrored (read-only) to git: > > git://git.apache.org/stanbol.git > http://github.com/apache/stanbol > > But I can check Infra to make a testing migration to a real repository. The > transition should not take so long. > > What do you think? Comments are welcomed. > > Cheers, > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Senior Researcher > Knowledge and Media Technologies > Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria > T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 > sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at > http://www.salzburgresearch.at -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
