Hi Reto, On 02/06/14 11:42, Reto Gmür wrote:
We had discussions when the code was originally added. And yes some problems where reported and fixed. IIRC those problems where all not actually related to the Stanbol security features but in the components not working correctly in a secure environment, i.e. they would alsohave appeared when integrating the components in any application server with an active Java security manager. Anyone could have vetoed the addition of the code, but nobody did. Also two relases containg the code where unanimously accepted.
Well, the word "unanimously" can be applied to the release itself, I do agree. But I guess you cannot extend such unanimity to those concrete components.
I do not need the features these modules introduce, therefore I obviously have some questions if they really fit in the scope of the project. But you are right that this is not the time for such discussion, but at some point we should have, so I'll cast my vote accordingly.
Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Senior Researcher Knowledge and Media Technologies Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at http://www.salzburgresearch.at
