Hi Umutcan, The Linked Media Framework [1] tried to build a think like you described. In this case it was running a Sesame based triple store, Solr for Semantic Search and Stanbol for enhancing contents all in a single instance. Was we learned form that was that it makes much more sense to keep those things separated.
If you want everything in Stanbol I can try to give you some pointers: Im not the most knowledgeable person on the Ontonet, Reasoning and Rules component. But AFAIK it uses Clerezza as storage component. So you can use any triple store that is supported by Clerezza. The most commonly used one is Jena TDB. Stanbol also has a very simple SPARQL endpoint typically published under "/sparql" (http://localhost:8080/sparql) via this you can access graphs managed by Clerezza. So if you have your RDF data stored as Clerezza Graphs you should be able to query them using this endpoint. So if the Ontonet and Reasoning components can use Clerezza to store results it should be possible to also use the Stanbol server as Sparql instance. I hope some of the Ontonet people see this and answer this question Make sure to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT because 0.12.* still use an older Clerezza version that does not yet support Clerezza Fastlane [2] best Rupert [1] https://bitbucket.org/srfgkmt/lmf/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-468 On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Umutcan Şimşek <umutcan.sim...@mni.thm.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to implement semantic search for a CMS written in PHP that we use > in my university as a part of my master's thesis. > > Ontonet seems to be a good solution for storing and reasoning on instance > and conceptual data. However, as far as I understand from previous > questions, ontonet does not provide a sparql endpoint. > > This leaves me at a point where I need to decide if I should use Stanbol > only for semantic lifting and use another triple store provides sparql > endpoint. Another approach in my mind, retrieving ontologies from ontonet > temporarily to a reasoner and storing them back with inferred triples, but I > wonder if there is a simpler way that involves only Stanbol components. > > Is there a formal way to integrate external triple stores to Stanbol? Could > you suggest some other solution without an external triple store? > > Regards > > ---- > > Umutcan Simsek, MSc Candidate > Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Giessen, Germany > Ege University, Izmir, Turkey > -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/
