Hi Rajan, The demo never included any Java code.
The module just provides configurations [1] and datafiles [2]. Those will be installed with the bundle using the Sling Installer and Stanbol DataFileProvider infrastructure when the bundle is installed. Note the <Install-Path> and <Data-Files> instructions configured for the maven-bundle-plugin in the pom.xml file. The demo also provides a shell script [3] the indexes eHealth related datasets and of corse the README explaining the demo best Rupert [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/branches/release-0.12/demos/ehealth/src/main/resources/config/ [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/branches/release-0.12/demos/ehealth/src/main/resources/datafiles/ [3] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/branches/release-0.12/demos/ehealth/index.sh On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:27 PM, <raja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > Thanks a lot for the detailed answers. Let me play a little bit further > before I ask additional follow-up questions. > > As far as demo is concerned, I am interested in eHealth demo as it covers > lots of items from my questions. At present, the Java code for it is missing. > Is it possible to restore Java code for eHealth demo in 0.12 branch? > > With best regards, > Rajan > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 27, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Rupert Westenthaler >> <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Rajan Shah <raja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As I am trying to get my hands around stanbol, I have couple general design >>> questions. >>> >>> *1. Enhancement Chain firing and results* >>> >>> How to find out which enhancement chain detected which entities? One way, I >>> could see that by adding/removing particular chain. Is it possible to just >>> enable it via logging within current code? >>> >>> For ex. >>> I have a chain categorized-linking and would like to find out whether this >>> chain fired and labeled entities properly >> >> A enhancement chain has 1..* enhancement engines. The engines create >> the annotations not the chain. So your question should be what engine >> is creating an annotation. This information is provided by the >> dc:creator and dc:contributor metadata of the enhancement. See also >> the documentation at [1] >> >>> >>> *2. Categorize entities differently* >>> >>> Is it possible to categorize your detected entities as something else? >>> i.e. other than People, Organizations or Places >>> >>> What steps one need to take in current framework to achieve the same? >> >> You can use the Custom NER Model Extraction Engine [2]. >> The models used in the documentation of this engine can be found at [3] >> >>> >>> *3. Domain specific modeling* >>> >>> Suppose, I have a small domain and various types of entities. I am >>> interested in >>> >>> a. analyzing various entities >>> b. linking them with other entities and find relations from dbpedia/freebase >>> c. infer interesting aspects using reasoning >>> >>> Is Stanbol the way to go or Marmotta? or Is it preferred to develop a >>> custom engine using Stanbol which uses internal components to perform all >>> of the above tasks? >> >> * Entity linking to your custom vocabulary in Stanbol >> * If you want to have your custom entities linked with >> dbpedia/freebase it is better to do that in the vocabulary. I think >> Google refine provided reconciliation to freebase. that could be >> definitely an option. >> * If you want to find additional entities contained in >> freebase/dbpedia configuring an other entity linking in Stanbol makes >> complete sense. >> >> Not sure what you mean with "infer interesting aspects using reasoning". >> >>> >>> *4. Enhance detected entities by annotation* >>> >>> Suppose, opennlp-ner detected an entity xyz. If I want to annotate this >>> entity with additional attributes/fields using different custom >>> vocabularies, what are the dev. steps I need to take? >>> >> >> If you just want to link Named Entities with a controlled vocabulary >> you can use the FST linking engine [4] with the Linking Mode set to >> NER (read the Linking Mode of the engines documentation). In short you >> will want to configure a "Apache Stanbol Enhancer Engine: FST Linking: >> Named Entities" for the vocabulary you want to link against. >> >> >>> *5. Previous demo project(s)* >>> >>> At the same time, any luck with restoring demo project(s) within 0.12 >>> branch ? I believe, it demonstrates various aspects and it would be great >>> to have it restored. >>> >> >> I hope those are still functional in the 0.12 branch. No immediate >> plans to move them to 1.0.0 (mainly because of lack of time). >> Contributions are very welcome. >> >> Hope this helps >> best >> Rupert >> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Rajan >> >> >> [1] >> http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/enhancementstructure#fiseenhancement >> [2] >> https://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/engines/opennlpcustomner >> [3] >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/branches/release-0.12/demos/ehealth/src/main/resources/datafiles/ >> [4] >> http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/engines/lucenefstlinking >> >> >> -- >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> | REDLINK.CO >> .......................................................................... >> | http://redlink.co/ -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/
