That is what it used to do, right? Seems that it should because not everyone is subscribed to issues@ or they might have filters setup to ignore them. If this is the case then they wouldn't have a chance to get involved with development related discussions spawned from changes to a jira issue.
Travis >-----Original Message----- >From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:03 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Reply-To for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >The Reply-To address for the issues list is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >I'm wondering if that's what we want. Shouldn't it be set to dev like >the commits list is? > >Martin >
