Eric Lemings wrote:
Is this like negative testing where tests are intended to fail tocompile, link, and/or execute?
No, it's unintended failures that have been analyzed but not fixed yet. E.g., a test failing to compile (or link, or run) due to a bug in an old version of a (still supported) compiler that's hard to work around and that has been fixed in a newer version of the compiler. Martin
Just wondering... Brad.
