Martin Sebor wrote: > > > You're right, I was looking at the output of %.g. Looks like we need > to replace the "%g" with "%.0g" here. Let me take care of that. > >
Actually, I don't think the patch has been applied yet. Farid, please remember to update the test as Travis suggests before committing the patch. Martin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--punct.cpp-tp15716394p16053620.html Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
