IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably shouldn't be a secondary platform. I could state many reasons, but suffice it to say that IMHO MSVC 7.1 should also be on the best effort list.
Thoughts? -- Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: 4.2.1 platforms > > Here's my proposed list of platforms for 4.2.1. I don't think > we can quite meet the release goals outlined in the release > policy (I don't see us cleaning up all the test failures and > warnings on all Primary > platforms) but we might as well try to use the process to the > extent we can. > > Let me know if I've missed something. Once we have the final > list I'd like to open a vote on it. > > Primary: > > HP aCC 6.16/HP-UX > HP aCC 3.74/HP-UX > gcc 3.4, 4/Linux > Intel C++ 10/Linux/Windows > MSVC 8.0, 9.0/Windows > Sun C++ 5.9/Solaris > XLC++ 9.0/AIX > > Secondary: > > EDG eccp 3.9/Linux > gcc 3.2/Linux > gcc 3.4/FreeBSD > Intel C++ 9.1/Linux/Windows > MSVC 7.1/Windows > Sun C++ 5.9/Linux > Sun C++ 5.8, 5.7/Solaris > XLC++ 8.0, 7.0/AIX 5 > VisualAge 6.0/AIX 5 > > Best Effort: > > EDG eccp 3.9/Solaris > gcc 4/Darwin > HP C++ /Tru64 UNIX 6.5 > MIPSpro 7.41/IRIX 6.5 > Sun C++ 5.3/Solaris >
