Eric Lemings wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: //stdcxx/trunk/tests/localization/22_synopsis.cpp
Eric Lemings wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: //stdcxx/trunk/tests/localization/22_synopsis.cpp
Eric Lemings wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Lemings
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:43 AM
To: Martin Sebor; Travis Vitek
Subject: RE: //stdcxx/trunk/tests/localization/22_synopsis.cpp
...
I'm testing with gcc on Linux and this is not defined which
in turn leads to compile errors.
And where is get_locale_category()? I can't find it anywhere.
See the %{Lc} directive to rw_printf(). Here are some use cases:
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/stdcxx/trunk/tests/self/0.pr
intf.cpp?r=trunk#l1061
Martin
What is/was the 2nd boolean parameter to get_locale_category() and
does it have any bearing on the %{Lc} directive?
I don't remember off the top of my head. Why don't you look
at the implementation of the function in the old driver:
http://tinyurl.com/3ozfpb
Ah, it does have bearing on the output. Is there a formatting directive
in the test driver that differentiates "std::locale::monetary" from
"LC_MONETARY" for example?
There's no need for that. The LC_XXX macros are guaranteed
to be distinct from the C++ locale category constants. See
the test for some use cases:
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/stdcxx/trunk/tests/self/0.printf.cpp?r=trunk#l1061
Martin
