>Martin Sebor wrote: > >Has anyone tested or looked at the new patch? Travis? >
I have not tested it, but I pointed out that it still has problems in my previous post in this thread... http://tinyurl.com/4pyr4j. I mention that the msdn docs say you can only reliably use fseek() to move to the origins [begin and end of file] or to a value previously attained from a call to ftell(). Andrew's patch uses fseek() in a manner that is inconsistent with both these requirements in several places [rbinit(), rbsync(), and rbgetc()]. IMO, this makes the patch no good. That said, I'm running a test on with a regular windows build just to be sure. Even if that works, to be absolutely certain that this fix works I'll have to emulate the nightly build system get the entire source heirarchy on windows system with unix line ends. Travis >Martin > >Andrew Black wrote: >> Not a whole lot of work it seems. >> >> I've been looking into this problem this afternoon, and I >> believe I've determined a solution. >>
