> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 9:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: stdcxx stringstreams 2x slower than gcc > ... > I think the difference between 8D and 12D is due to the mutex > in stingstream. Even though there's no locking the mutex still > is initialized and that's what I suspect accounts for the slow > runtimes. We need an issue to remind us to fix it as soon as > binary compatibility permits it.
I conclude from this that the mutex is exposed in the public ABI? If so, why? I would think the mutex would not need be a part of the public ABI. Brad.
