Eric Lemings wrote: > >Martin Sebor wrote: >> >> I don't expect us to be dropping any platforms but it would be >> nice to add more recent releases of the currently supported >> compilers, such as aCC 3.80 and gcc 4.3. > >For a patch release? I'd understand dropping support in major >release and possibly minor releases, and adding support in minor >releases, but I would think nothing would change, in terms of >supported platforms, between patch releases. Not that there >would be a problem with adding support in patch releases also; >just seems like a distinguishing factor between minor and patch >releases. >
I thought we added platforms for 4.2.1 [aCC 6.16]? >> I don't know of any >> others. Are there any that we'd like to add? Maybe AIX 6 if >> and when we get it. > >I noticed Intel C++ 10.1 is not on the list. > >That brings up another related issue. Do we need to identify >the exact version numbers? Or does HP C++ 6.16 for example >mean that any other versions of the 6.x compiler are >intentionally NOT supported? > >Brad. >
