> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: XLC++ build failures (was: Re: official location for > stdcxx build results) > > Eric Lemings wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Martin Sebor > >> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:54 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: official location for stdcxx build results > >> > >> Eric Lemings wrote: > >>> > >>> Was just looking at this page: > >>> > >>> http://stdcxx.apache.org/builds/4.2.x/aix-5.3-ppc-vacpp-9.0.html > >>> > >>> I assume this page was not generated correctly. Something > >> still amiss? > >> > >> The page is fine (the presentation could be better), but there > >> is a problem with all the AIX builds. They've all been failing > >> due to undefined library symbols. I've been assuming it had to > >> do with all the recent infrastructure screwups that Scott noted > >> the other day but upon closer inspection I noticed that we're > >> using -qtempinc when we should be using -qtemplateregistry. I > >> wonder if this change might be responsible: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=652954 > > > > Uh yeah, quite possible. The build directory, but not necessarily > > the source directory, by definition has to be writable. I assume > > that's where configuration tests are built and executed also, > > unless I'm missing something. > > Most but not all of them. The change above is to code that runs > with CWD=$TOPDIR. My local builds run fine so I'm puzzled as to > why it's failing. Travis, any ideas?
If the script continues processing, shouldn't the script change back to the original directory after its done? Or does it just exit? Brad.
