[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vitek
Date: Wed Jun 4 13:53:00 2008
New Revision: 663373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663373&view=rev
Log:
2008-06-04 Travis Vitek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Added: stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.gslice.array.cassign.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.gslice.array.cassign.cpp?rev=663373&view=auto
[...]
+
+ if (!repeat)
+ {
Please correct the brace placement :)
+ buf [i++] = std::size_t (val);
+ }
+ else
+ {
Same here.
+ const std::size_t n = buf [i-1];
[...]
+template <class T>
+void test_mul_assign (const T*, const char *tname, const char *opname)
+{
+ rw_info (0, 0, __LINE__,
+ "std::gslice_array<%s>::operator%s (const std::valarray<%1$s>&)",
+ tname, opname);
+
+ void (std::gslice_array<T>::*op)(const std::valarray<T>&) const =
+ &std::gslice_array<T>::operator*=;
Please keep an eye on this test. Many older compilers tend
to have problems with taking the address of member functions
of class templates.
+
[...]
+int main (int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ // FIXME: add command line options to enable/disable each operator
Seems this is done below, no?
+ return rw_test (argc, argv, __FILE__,
+ "gslice.array.comp.assign",
+ 0 /* no comment */,
+ run_test,
+ "|-times~ "
+ "|-divide~ "
+ "|-modulo~ "
+ "|-plus~ "
+ "|-minus~ "
+ "|-xor~ "
+ "|-and~ "
+ "|-or~ "
+ "|-shift_left~ "
+ "|-shift_right~",
+ opt_assign + inx_mul_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_div_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_mod_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_add_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_sub_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_xor_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_and_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_or_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_shl_assign,
+ opt_assign + inx_shr_assign,
+ (void*)0 /* sentinel */);
+}
\ No newline at end of file
Don't forget to add it (the missing newline).
Great test, btw.!
Martin
