Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm getting compilation errors with gcc 4.3. Is the implementation
supposed to be stable at this point with any compiler or are there
still some major issues?
I just did a sync of 4.3.x and a build with CXXFLAGS="-std=gnu++0x
-D_RWSTD_EXT_CXX_0X" and didn't run into any problems with <type_traits>
or the 20.meta.*.cpp tests (though 20.forward.cpp and
26.valarray.cassign.cpp both fail to compile).
I did another build without those flags and I do see some compile errors
in both the traits and tuple code. I'll fix the traits issues.
Thanks. I hadn't realized I needed -std=gnu++0x and was getting
a ton of errors. That, and I also forgot to reconfigure to get
_RWSTD_NO_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES #defined.
Btw., to make using C++ 0x easier we might want to automatically
#define _RWSTD_EXT_CXX_0X when the __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
macro is #defined (and #undef _RWSTD_NO_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES and
other config macros #defined as a result of the absence of the
option during configuration).
Travis
Thanks
Martin
