This mean you're quiting SourcePro/Rogue Wave but and starting work on STDCXX now that know one can tell you otherwise? :P
> -----Original Message----- > From: Liviu Nicoara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:10 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] naming convention for variadic template > arguments (was: Re: svn commit: r668318 - in > /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h > include/rw/_tuple_traits.h include/tuple > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor on behalf of Martin Sebor > > Sent: Fri 6/27/2008 3:05 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [VOTE] naming convention for variadic template > arguments (was: Re: svn commit: r668318 - in > /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h > include/rw/_tuple_traits.h include/tuple > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp) > > > > This thread kind of fizzled out so let me resurrect it and reiterate > > the proposed naming convention to follow unless more specific names > > are appropriate: > > > > template <class _TypeT, class... _Types> # 1 > > > > [...] > > Check the box below to vote: > > > > [x] In favor (of #1) > [ ] Opposed (suggest an improvement and rationale) > > -L >
