Eric Lemings wrote:
I did debug and optimize builds on RH5, Sol10, and HP-UX 11.31 and they
all built fine (unless I overlooked something).
Will double-check.
I accidentally committed a fix for the problem last night:
http://tinyurl.com/597fug
I tested it with gcc but I haven't checked nightly results
yet, so if you could do that I'd appreciate it.
Martin
Brad.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r675315 -
/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: elemings
Date: Wed Jul 9 12:16:56 2008
New Revision: 675315
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675315&view=rev
Log:
2008-07-09 Eric Lemings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
STDCXX-550
* tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
(test_random_access_iterator):
Oops. Should be `!defined' in #if directive.
Modified:
stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
Modified: stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utili
ties/20.operators.cpp?rev=675315&r1=675314&r2=675315&view=diff
==============================================================
================
--- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
(original)
+++ stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
Wed Jul 9 12:16:56 2008
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
typedef RandomAccessIterator I;
-#if defined _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER
+#if !defined _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER
RandomNumberGenerator<typename I::difference_type> rndgen;
This won't compile when RandomAccessIterator is a plain pointer,
which both string::iterator and vector::iterator happen to be
when _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER is #defined (i.e., with optimization).
Martin
