Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
This all seems to work when using the trait with a
non-template type. If you want to use a template, it
has to be instantiated first. I think I'm going to
put the Edison compiler port on hold for now.
Yeah, it doesn't seem quite stable enough. Let's see what they
come back with, but unless there's something we're missing it
might be best to wait for 3.10. I assume HP aCC 6 isn't any
better?
I got things working quite well on aCC 6.16. It doesn't support any of
the built-ins, but I'm able to work around a lot of those issues.
AFAICS, it's based on EDG eccp 3.8, so it's likely to have the same
problems as those we discussed yesterday. A simple test case using
__is_empty(int) compiles fine, but as expected the compiler spits
out the same error for the __is_empty (S<0>) case as we saw eccp
3.9 do. Let me try to find out when HP plans to upgrade to the
latest EDG front end.
The
one big issue is that I can't implement __rw_is_class<> accurately
without __is_class(). Without this I get compile failures in the
implementation of some traits that require an accurate implementation.
This causes 20.meta.unary.prop.cpp to fail to compile.
Now that we have eccp-3.10.1 I'll have another go at it.
Thanks,
Travis
