Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
faridz wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
Log:
2008-09-09 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.
Modified:
stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
Modified:
stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regres
s/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp?rev=693424&r1=693423&r2=693424&view=diff
===============================================================
===============
--- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
(original)
+++
stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp Tue Sep
9 03:35:59 2008
@@ -138,14 +138,14 @@
assert (SCHAR_MAX == +127);
assert (SHRT_MAX >= +32767);
-#ifndef _RWSTD_EDG_ECCP
+#if !defined (_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP) && !defined (_MSC_VER)
_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP should only be #defined when we're using the EDG eccp
vanilla demo, but not when we're using a compiler that sits on top of
the EDG front end such as Intel C++. If this condition evaluates to
true we have a configuration problem...
The seems valid to me. The conditional is only true for compilers other
than EDG and Microsoft.
You're right, my mistake. I missed the '!' in front of defined.
Martin
// avoid exercising with the EDG eccp front end (strict mode)
assert (LONG_BIT >= 32);
assert (SSIZE_MAX >= _POSIX_SSIZE_MAX);
assert (WORD_BIT >= 32);
-#endif // EDG eccp
+#endif // EDG eccp || MSVC || ICC/Windows
assert (UCHAR_MAX >= 255);
assert (UINT_MAX >= 4294967295);
