Many projects have CTR on trunk and RTC (based on trunk revisions) to branch. This works well.
On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote: > On 09/06/12 23:00, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> Every project has certain branch strategy, I'm not sure about this so >>> maybe Martin can advice. I prefer to develop on trunk and cherry pick >>> to the other branches avoiding bulk merges (and that's in both >>> directions). >> >> We've done most work on 4.2.x for historical reasons. I think >> a better strategy is to develop, as you suggest, on trunk which >> has the least restrictive commit policy, and merge changes out >> to the more restrictive branches as appropriate. > > If open to voting, I am for trunk first, branches later. > > Liviu >
