We can simply re-ask infra... :) On Aug 9, 2012, at 5:13 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like the Bloodhound guys might be amenable to our use of their instance. > > That said: Infra has already constructed the BZ stuff that Jim asked for. :-/ > > -g > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gary Martin <gary.mar...@wandisco.com> > Date: Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:01 AM > Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #156: Local copy of bloodhound part > of Apache repo for browse functionality > To: bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org > > > On 08/09/2012 06:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> Well . I don't know if I understood correctly , so it's not clear to >>> me whether we will have git or svn repository after all this . In case >> >> We'll have a copy of the primary ASF repository (ie. .../repos/asf/...). >> >> My comments regarding Git repositories were for the Allura people. For >> Bloodhound to be fully usable at the ASF, we'll want Git support at >> some point, but that can certainly wait. >> >> (on that note, the new Apache Steve TLP (no web site yet; small group >> to do STV voting tools) is pondering asking whether they could use BH, >> and whether this community would support that) > > > That would certainly be cool with me. Hopefully we will get > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ updated soon to demonstrate how > we are doing. Perhaps that would make it easier for Apache Steve to > decide. There are things that would be nice for us to improve on but, > as far as I can tell, we have not stopped from being a usable system. > Anyway, anything that drives additional feedback would be fantastic. > > >>> we are talking of git , the only thing I wanted to mention is that >>> there are some (performance) issues regarding git support in Trac . >> >> No worries. Something for another day. > > > Yes, interesting that. I will look into it soon I hope. Thanks for the > heads up, Olemis. > > Cheers, > Gary >
