nice start here Daniel, really like the direction. When I ran steve for the
incubator elections most of the gotchas where around the command line flags
and hardcoded values, if you need help count me in

-Jake

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:

> (sent from wrong address at first, here goes...)
>
> HI folks,
> I've been wondering for some time if it wasn't possible to make board
> voting a bit less stressful.
> As it is right now, you have to mentally keep a note of letters and their
> corresponding names and how that all adds up to a weird string you are
> typing into a text field - it can get a bit confusing, especially when you
> suddenly change your mind and want to rearrange things.
>
> So I came up with an interactive UI for managing those sort of votes,
> where you can drag'n'drop candidates onto a ballot (as many as you like, of
> course) and then rearrange that ballot as you see fit with your mouse. Not
> only will i display the candidates in a more friendly manner, it will also
> conform to the old Steve methods and generate an STV string for voting.
> I've been working with Jim to get some extra features into it, and it's
> starting to look real nice.
>
> You can see a demo with fake names at http://asfcloud.com/steve.html
> I have a patch for the perl script so that everything - sans the statement
> data - will work out of the box.
>
> To get to the point; Is this something we would want to implement, maybe
> showcase at the next annual meeting? The feedback I've gotten has been
> ranging from "I like it" to "wow, that's awesome", so I think we could
> really help some folks if we could get this implemented.
>
> It's tested and should work with the latest versions of FireFox, Chrome,
> Internet Explorer, Safari, Opera etc (anything that will do HTML5).
> You can see a patch to cast-vote.pl at https://paste.apache.org/p/n1IU
> although it will also require the support files (JS, CSS, PNGs) to work
> properly.
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Flames?
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>

Reply via email to