Daniel I can’t keep up with your awesomeness. Great work. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Rich Bowen <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, March 20, 2015 at 8:01 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: YNA bulk voting? > > >On 03/20/2015 10:54 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> HI folks, >> I've been getting some requests to make voting on 10,20,50+ issues a bit >> faster, so I came up with an idea for YNA bulk voting, which I have >> committed to the pytest dir in the repo. >> >> You can view a live demo at: >> http://stv.website/bulk_yna.html?foo/9313c1b2ba82404b006930d9c964c19a >> including the spiffy spinner and all the other gunk I added :). >> >> The idea is that you'd simply go through the issues and click >> yes/no/abstain next to each issue, clicking to open up the vote details >> if you so like, but nonetheless simply throwing votes left and right in >> a faster manner than having to open up 100 pages and writing 'y' in each >> of them and then submitting the form. >> >> I know there could probably be some concerns over voters then voting >> without reviewing a subject, but I think that decision is up to the >> voters and not for us to educate on. If voters, as it has been hinted >> to me several times, want a faster way to vote on multiple YNA issues, I >> think we should let them have their way. >> >> WDYT? Feedback would really be appreciated. >> >> FWIW, I don't think the same could be implemented, nor should be >> implemented, for STV voting. >> >> With regards, >> Daniel. >> >> PS: No, this does not fall back to no-script gracefully. I plan to do >> that eventually, but as a separate project. > >I would be a huge fan of this. The idea of 100+ separate vote pages >makes me very squidgy. > > >-- >Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen >http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
