On 2015-03-24 12:55, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yes, I will try that.
Is STeVe is being used in current member meeting as the voting tool? If so,
would that constitute v1?
Yes, we use STeVe for our annual members meetings (just as it says on
our web site), but not the new version just yet, as it is largely
untested :)
So, what we have right now is v1 which has remained mostly unchanged
(stable) since 2010 (apart from STV voting which was recently improved).
v2 would be the new Python stuff, and I'm hoping that we can use that
for 2016 meeting.
With regards,
Daniel.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
Probably a plugin of sorts that would enable a specific type of voting.
As it is right now, you _could_ use YNA voting to get away with it, but I
think you may want to add some extra features to the vote, such as comments
or what have you.
As I have just finished YNA voting today, I'll be looking into the best
way to allow for plugins to add additional vote types to pysteve :)
But you're welcome to try out the demo and set up an election with a YNA
issue and see if that's enough for you.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-24 12:46, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if STeVe (NG that is) would not be beneficial to the procedural
voting within the projects? What would be required to have it working so?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
