On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > May I suggest that we have JIRA notifications are sent to dev@ in stead > of > > issues@. That way everybody is faster up to speed regarding what is > > happening in JIRA, than having to go over to another mailing list? > > As a lurker, I really appreciate it when architectural and API > discussions happen on the dev list and only nitty gritty > implementation stuff happens in the issue tracker. > ALL discussion should be on the dev@ list. Including "nitty gritty implementation". That should not be buried in a separate system. JIRA is for tracking issues. Not for discussion. The mailing list is for discussion. Until our JIRA traffic becomes burdensome (which it isn't), then splitting it to its own mailing list merely hides that information from the development community. Today, we barely see any JIRA traffic. Same reason we don't have a user@ mailing list ... there just isn't enough traffic to justify the separations. Cheers, -g
