On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015-04-03 00:13, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> ... >>> - Set the random seed to actually be random now. Setting it to 0 is just >>> bad juju and can be reverse engineered to place candidates in such a way >>> that a tie will always favor candidate X. >>> >>> I disagree with this change. This now means you/me could run the report >> and >> get different results. That is even worse than the extreme likelihood >> somebody could rig the vote. >> > See r1671014 as a compromise - that way the seed stays the same no matter > how many times you tally, but cannot be determined beforehand. > Good idea. Sure, that works for me! Thx, -g
