Product name magic happens here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/steve/trunk/doap_steve.rdf
On 21 May 2017 at 23:25, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > One could argue that Apache Steve is the committee, and STeVe is the > product of that committee... *waves hand magically* > > On 05/21/2017 01:42 PM, sebb wrote: >> Fixing CI would also fix derived data such as >> >> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?steve >> >> On 20 May 2017 at 13:31, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I see no need for them to be aligned. So, *shrug* >>> >>> On May 20, 2017 4:23 AM, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 20 May 2017 at 02:14, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> The naming of Apache STeVe is a play on the STV voting algorithm. Thus, >>>> the >>>>> funny case that we use for it is appropriate. >>>> >>>> I realise that. >>>> >>>> So does committee-info need to be changed? >>>> CI is currently the canonical source for PMCs >>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:44 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> AFAICT, the project was created as "Steve", and is listed as such in >>>>>> committee-info.txt >>>>>> >>>>>> However the website and recent reports show the name as "STeVe". >>>>>> >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>> >
