Agree with Nathan.
Seems like it doesn't prepared because we should take care of STORM-350.

2014-11-15 10:54 GMT+09:00 Nathan Marz <[email protected]>:

> -1. Looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350 it seems
> the
> upgrade to disruptor caused message loss issues. That upgrade should be
> reverted, or I'd like @clockfly to provide more insight.
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Harsha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am +1 releasing 0.9.3
> > +1 on including STORM-555.
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 02:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> > > I’d like to get the community’s opinion on releasing 0.9.3 with what is
> > > currently in the 0.9.3 branch. This would be the official release
> > > (skipping the unofficial rc2).
> > >
> > > The only addition I’d like to include is STORM-555, which should be
> > > eligible for merging early next week.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Taylor
> > >
> > >
> > > Email had 1 attachment:
> > > + signature.asc
> > >   1k (application/pgp-signature)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Twitter: @nathanmarz
> http://nathanmarz.com
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Reply via email to