STORM-350 has been reverted in the master branch as well. -Taylor
On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: > +1 on reverting on master too and like to see 0.9.3 out :). > Thanks, > Harsha > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014, at 01:55 PM, Bobby Evans wrote: >> I would love to see 0.9.3 out. - Bobby >> >> >> On Monday, November 17, 2014 3:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz >> <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Thanks for the input Bobby and Nathan. I’ll revert it there as well >> unless anyone proposes a compelling reason not to. >> >> What are your thoughts on moving forward with the 0.9.3 release? >> >> -Taylor >> >> On Nov 17, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Nathan Marz <nat...@nathanmarz.com> wrote: >> >>> I agree, it should be reverted on master until we can figure out what's >>> going on. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I would prefer to revert it on master too, just so that if anyone decides >>>> to use master storm, they have a chance of getting something that, at least >>>> as far as we know, works. >>>> >>>> - Bobby >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, November 17, 2014 2:58 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < >>>> ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Okay, I’ve reverted the commit in the 0.9.3 branch. I did not revert it >>>> in master. >>>> >>>> For master we can either choose to revert it there as well, or leave it >>>> and continue to look for a root cause. I’m open to either and would like to >>>> hear what other people think. >>>> >>>> In addition to the revert of STORM-350, I also merged the following to the >>>> master and 0.9.3 branches: >>>> >>>> * STORM-558 change "swap!" to "reset!" to fix assignment-versions in >>>> supervisor >>>> * STORM-555: Storm json response should set charset to UTF-8 >>>> >>>> What are everyone’s thoughts on proceeding with a 0.9.3 release? >>>> >>>> -Taylor >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Even if we cannot reproduce it in all cases, the change was rather small >>>> not totally necessary. +1 for reverting. >>>>> - Bobby >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:23 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am able to reproduce this using Sean's topology. I am +1 on reverting >>>>> this. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Harsha >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 06:43 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >>>>>> I agree completely. However, I've been unable to reproduce the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we need to get more eyes on this. If anyone has the resources to >>>>>> do so please do. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm +1 for reverting, but I'd also like to have a root cause. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Taylor >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agree with Nathan. >>>>>>> Seems like it doesn't prepared because we should take care of >>>> STORM-350. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-11-15 10:54 GMT+09:00 Nathan Marz <nat...@nathanmarz.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -1. Looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350 it >>>> seems >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> upgrade to disruptor caused message loss issues. That upgrade should >>>> be >>>>>>>> reverted, or I'd like @clockfly to provide more insight. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am +1 releasing 0.9.3 >>>>>>>>> +1 on including STORM-555. >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Harsha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 02:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I’d like to get the community’s opinion on releasing 0.9.3 with >>>> what is >>>>>>>>>> currently in the 0.9.3 branch. This would be the official release >>>>>>>>>> (skipping the unofficial rc2). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only addition I’d like to include is STORM-555, which should be >>>>>>>>>> eligible for merging early next week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Taylor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Email had 1 attachment: >>>>>>>>>> + signature.asc >>>>>>>>>> 1k (application/pgp-signature) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Twitter: @nathanmarz >>>>>>>> http://nathanmarz.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Name : 임 정택 >>>>>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net >>>>>>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior >>>>>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Twitter: @nathanmarz >>> http://nathanmarz.com >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
