Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/374#discussion_r24039215
  
    --- Diff: 
external/storm-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/jdbc/bolt/JdbcBolt.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.storm.jdbc.bolt;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.OutputFieldsDeclarer;
    +import backtype.storm.tuple.Tuple;
    +import org.apache.storm.jdbc.common.Column;
    +import org.apache.storm.jdbc.mapper.JdbcMapper;
    +import org.slf4j.Logger;
    +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
    +
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.List;
    +
    +/**
    + * Basic bolt for writing to any Database table.
    + * <p/>
    + * Note: Each JdbcBolt defined in a topology is tied to a specific table.
    + */
    +public class JdbcBolt extends AbstractJdbcBolt {
    +    private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(JdbcBolt.class);
    +
    +    private String tableName;
    +    private JdbcMapper jdbcMapper;
    +
    +    public JdbcBolt withConfigKey(String configKey) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Moved back to constructor. I am not sure what you mean when you say we 
could just pass the config into the Bolt. Hikari has many configuration 
https://github.com/brettwooldridge/HikariCP. The configKey is so user can 
provide any subset of those configs. so the configKey is just name of the 
config key in your submitted storm-conf, the value of this should be a map of 
hikari config keys to their corresponding values.
    
    I can extract a connectionProvider interface and create a Hikari 
implementation that users have to construct to initialize the Bolts. This will 
mean the bolts will not have a config Key, users will be able to use whatever 
connection pool they feel most comfortable with and the configuration details 
will live in the connection provider. Do you think that will be better than 
what we currently have.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to