I agree with Richard, in addition I think we should also include https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/437 once Nathan is on board with the changes.
Thanks Parth On 3/5/15, 9:56 AM, "Richard Kellogg" <rmkell...@comcast.net> wrote: >I believe the pull request attached to STORM-693 >(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-693) warrants inclusion. > >Could someone at least merge this into the trunk? > >-----Original Message----- >From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:38 PM >To: dev@storm.apache.org >Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0 > >I'd like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance release) >and >0.10.0 (security release). > >0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes: > > STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection >strategy and buffering messages > STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to >java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist. > >Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users. >I'd >be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I'm >interested >in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional patches to master >that >should be considered for 0.9.4. > >0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to the >changes above, it includes all the new security features and numerous >fixes >and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for a full list). > >Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding >bugs/patches >should we consider before releasing? > >I'm fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is additional >work >to be done, but I'd like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 release. > >Thoughts? > >-Taylor >
