[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14376721#comment-14376721
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-587:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user harshach opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/475

    STORM-587. trident transactional state in zk should be namespaced with 
topology id.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/harshach/incubator-storm STORM-719

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/475.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #475
    
----
commit 8a264ad177595529991403fa6b2842d561e2b4b3
Author: Sriharsha Chintalapani <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-23T21:24:12Z

    STORM-587. trident transactional state in zk should be namespaced with 
topology id.

----


> trident transactional state in zk should be namespaced with topology id
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-587
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-587
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Parth Brahmbhatt
>
> Currently when a trident transaction spout is initialized it creates a node 
> in zk under /transactional with the spout name as the node's name. This is 
> pretty dangerous as any other topology can be submitted with same spout name 
> and  now these 2 spouts will be overwriting each other's states. I believe it 
> is better to namespace this with topologyId just like all other zk entries 
> under /storm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to