Yes, we should ask Apache Infra to set up Travis CI (with asfgit account), which is not an issue cause many projects on Apache already uses Travis CI. ex. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6161
I've just finished work about adopting Travis CI (with my fork), so we're ready! https://travis-ci.org/HeartSaVioR/storm/builds/56021889 Could any committers help requesting set up Travis CI to Apache Infra? Btw, jira issue link is here, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-704 and PR is here, https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/486 Thanks in advance! ps. Please note that Travis CI becomes too slow, and it actually runs mvn install -DskipTests before build, so it takes some mins to assign VM and boot, and another 10 ~ 15 mins to build for now. 2015-03-26 23:54 GMT+09:00 Bobby Evans <[email protected]>: > I would love to see CI setup. I don't know how Apache feels about > travis-ci, we mostly ran into issues with setting up ruby on the jenkins > nodes. Now I am sure there will be issues with nodejs. If travis-ci makes > this simpler I would be all for using it. But because it requires some > github hooks we will need Apache Infra to help out setting it up. > - Bobby > > > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:39 PM, 임정택 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Parth, > Thanks for information! > Since there were some trials, my trial seems to be valid. :) > > Btw, I've seen succeed build from Travis CI, please see > https://travis-ci.org/HeartSaVioR/storm/jobs/54211636 > Based on this we can see we already overcome multi-lang test, too. > > I've got another hurdle, we should open test-reports directory to see > clojure tests, which I can't find clearer solution. > We should rely on stdout / stderr, or upload these to somewhere. > > Please expose your any ideations about this. > > Regards. > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > 2015-03-26 9:51 GMT+09:00 Parth Brahmbhatt <[email protected]>: > > > IIRC, Taylor and Bobby both tried to setup CI and got stuck because of > > multi-lang feature which needs ruby/node.js/python to be installed on the > > host. > > > > Thanks > > Parth > > > > On 3/25/15, 5:10 PM, "임정택" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >Hi all! > > > > > >I'd like to hear your opinion on adopting public CI. > > >Now Apache Storm takes advantage of Github, we can apply Travis CI to > some > > >more advantages. > > >Detailed informations are on JIRA issue ( > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-704). > > > > > >If you don't know Travis CI, it's better to take a look at. > > >https://travis-ci.org/xetorthio/jedis > > > > > >Actually I'm trying to integrate it, and resolved many hurdles but got > > >stuck. > > > > > >If you're interested in, please participate to resolve issue. :) > > > > > >Important question on this, I don't know why Storm didn't have CI. > > >Is there some kind of decision about not having CI? > > >If then this issue should be resolved as invalid. > > > > > >Thanks! > > > > > >Regards. > > >Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > > > > > -- > Name : 임 정택 > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net > Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior > > > -- Name : 임 정택 Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
