[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14507930#comment-14507930
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-746:
--------------------------------------

Github user knusbaum commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/499#issuecomment-95340449
  
    Yes, I'm +1


> Disable Spout Ack Init when there is no output task
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-746
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-746
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.2-incubating
>            Reporter: Derek Dagit
>            Assignee: Derek Dagit
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Suppose a user cannot easily modify the spout in the topology.
> The user has temporarily disabled transferring of tuples from a spout, for 
> debugging.
> In this case, when acking is used, each time the spout emits, it sends a 
> tuple to the acker bolt.  The bolt executes on this tuple by initializing the 
> bit-field used for tracking when the tuple "tree" has completed processing 
> (XOR-ing the new field with 0), then checking whether processing is complete 
> (by comparing the field to 0), and finally sending an ack in reply to the 
> spout.
> Normally, this is not a problem beyond the overhead, but on at least one 
> occasion in the course of debugging topology performance, the acker bolt's 
> host was so overloaded that it actually could not send the reply ack back to 
> the spout before the spout timed it out.  This resulted in a lot of Fails 
> reported for tuples that were not supposed to go anywhere in the first place, 
> and an unnecessary count against the max.spout.pending that evidently also 
> makes it harder to debug.
> This was very confusing to the user.
> I propose that we short-cut the ack init in the case when the spout does not 
> emit to any downstream tasks.
> I do have some misgivings already about making this change, as a spout 
> emitting nowhere could be considered outside the set of normal use cases for 
> Storm.  That said, I will not be unhappy if someone gives a -1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to