My opinion: In terms of supporting the 0.9.x release line, I think that’s critical, at the very least until 0.10.0 stable is released. More likely for some time thereafter for those who don’t want to (or can’t) upgrade.
Updates to the the 0.9.x line should be limited to bug fixes. I’d like to release a 0.10.0-beta2 or 0.10.0 soon. I haven’t seen much in terms of end user feedback on the beta. A few user/dev success stories would make me feel better about dropping the beta tag. As always, I’m open to any and all opinions. -Taylor > On Jul 14, 2015, at 5:43 PM, 임정택 <[email protected]> wrote: > > In addition to Enno's mail, I'd like to know we'd like to maintain three > version lines (currently 0.9.x, 0.10.x, 0.11.x) continuously, or it is just > a period of transition. > > I'm maintaining three version lines (bugfix, next minor, next major - with > respecting semver) from other project, and sometimes maintaining it is > really annoying, though most of the issues are breaking changes of next > major and current. > > Since stable version of Storm is 0.9.5, and some users want to upgrade > Storm with minimized impact so releasing 0.9.6 could make sense for now. > (It may be better to collect some bugfixes and backport before releasing > 0.9.6 since other version lines already has many bugfixes which can be > applied to 0.9.x.) > > But I also think we should make an effort to make 0.10.0 stable and release > official version. > Storm 0.10.0-beta was released one month ago, and we don't have a plan to > release next beta, or stable version. > After releasing 0.10.0 we can choose whether we maintain 0.9.x lines or not. > > If it's possible to release stable version of 0.10.0 faster, for example, > before end of this month, then we can delegate applying any bugfix issues > (except critical / blocker) to 0.10.0. > > tl;dr. > We can make an effort to 0.10.0 to make it stable, and release official > version faster. > If stable version of 0.10.0 could be released shortly, I would not want to > release any new 0.9.x versions except any critical or blocker bugs. > > Thanks, > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > 2015-07-15 5:04 GMT+09:00 Enno Shioji <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Taylor, >> >> >> @Bobby recommended I talk to you about a potential 0.9.6 release to fix >> STORM-763/839. The fixes are already merged to master, 0.10.x and 0.9.x. >> >> In a nutshell, they fix the following symptoms -- but the catch is that >> these symptoms only surface when connections between bolts are lost >> frequently. So I'm not sure whether it warrants a release. The symptoms >> are: >> - Thread deadlock hazard in Netty Client (STORM-839) >> - Slow reconnection (STORM-763) >> - Verbose error log (STORM-763) >> >> Anyways, just thought I'll ping you. Btw thanks for your work, we are using >> Storm extensively and it's been amazing! >> >> >> Enno >> > > > > -- > Name : 임 정택 > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net > Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
