Bump. Does anyone have opinions about this? I already did back-port some bugfixes (not in list) into 0.10.x and 0.9.x lines, but I'm not 100% sure that it is preferred way. Seems like we don't have explicit rules about doing back-port. Only thing I know is Taylor was (or has been) a gatekeeper.
Now I really want to know that it still need to be confirmed by Taylor before doing back-port. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2015-07-28 8:27 GMT+09:00 임정택 <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > Recently I see many bugfixes are only merged to master, or 0.10.x-branch. > > Since 0.10.0-beta1 introduces huge changeset, and it contains a lot of > bugfixes, I think we can consider backporting them to 0.9.x-branch before > releasing 0.9.6. > > I create a sheet and write down bugfix issues which could be backported, > and status of issue. (what versions it is applied, and what versions it can > be applied) > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KQrOlqk1hlE2oDmXFY34lJaY0PU7V5uxq9U1vfIhLq4/edit?usp=sharing > > Please let me know whenever you find missing spots or wrong contents. > > There seems to be other approach: > - release stable version of 0.10.0, and drop plan to release 0.9.6 so that > let all users who want bugfix release move to 0.10.0 > > Since a lot of bugfix issues are waiting for backporting, alternative > approach may be make sense. > > I'm open to hear any thoughts, so please share your opinions. > > Thanks, > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > to. Taylor > I don't know I can do backport without your confirmation. (by each issue) > If you want to decide about backporting yourself, I'll follow you. > -- Name : 임 정택 Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
