Sure, STORM-*.  ;-)

Here's a good example:

   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329

Compare that to this one:

   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-404

STORM-404 has a bunch of human-created comments, but it's readable since it
has no github-generated comments.  STORM-329 however intermixes the human
comments with the github ones.  It's really hard to read through.

To be clear, it's not that it's *confusing* per se -- it's that the
behavior is *cluttering* the comments, making it harder to see any
human-created comments since any JIRA issue with a PR will usually end up
with many automated comments.

BTW, I totally agree that linking from the JIRA issue to the github PR is
important!  Would be even nicer if the github PRs also directly linked back
to the JIRA issue with a clickable link.

- Erik

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, 임정택 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Erik,
>
> I think verbose logging of PR comments could be OK. I didn't experience any
> confusing.
> Maybe referring sample JIRA issues could help us to understand.
>
> But I'm also open to change cause other projects already have been doing.
> (for example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10474)
>
> In addition to SPARK has been doing, I'd like to still leave some events on
> github PR to JIRA issue, too.
>
> Btw, the thing I'm really annoyed is multiple mail notifications on each
> github comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2015-09-22 9:15 GMT+09:00 Erik Weathers <[email protected]>:
>
> > I find that these comments majorly distract from any discussion that may
> > occur in the JIRA issues themselves.   What value are these providing?  I
> > guess just insurance against GitHub being unavailable or going away?  But
> > that doesn't seem worth the distraction cost.  Is there any possibility
> of
> > removing this spamminess, or somehow putting them into attachments within
> > the JIRA issues so that they aren't directly in the comments?
> >
> > - Erik
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>

Reply via email to