[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shyam Rajendran updated STORM-1071:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
As part of gathering inputs for Resource Aware Scheduler, understanding the 
tuple network characteristics between tasks would be helpful. 
The present implementation of TaskMessage includes only the destination task id 
and message. Including the source task id to it would help us understand the 
task-task (component/component) network bandwidth characteristics.  It shall 
also avoid the deserialization of message to retrieve the source task id from 
the serialized tuple message.


  was:
As part of gathering inputs for Resource Aware Scheduler, understanding the 
tuple network characteristics between tasks would be helpful. 
The present implementation of TaskMessage includes only the destination task id 
and message. Including the source task id to it would help us understand the 
task-task (component/component) network bandwidth characteristics. 


> Task Message format to include source task id.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1071
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Shyam Rajendran
>            Assignee: Shyam Rajendran
>            Priority: Minor
>
> As part of gathering inputs for Resource Aware Scheduler, understanding the 
> tuple network characteristics between tasks would be helpful. 
> The present implementation of TaskMessage includes only the destination task 
> id and message. Including the source task id to it would help us understand 
> the task-task (component/component) network bandwidth characteristics.  It 
> shall also avoid the deserialization of message to retrieve the source task 
> id from the serialized tuple message.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to