[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14940262#comment-14940262
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1078:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user revans2 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/776

    STORM-1078: Updated RateTracker to be thread safe

    , more accurate, and very fast. Removed sub-sampling of rate calculation in 
disruptor, because sub-sampling was more expensive than just doing the 
calculation.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/revans2/incubator-storm STORM-1078

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/776.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #776
    
----
commit dbcb138603f55fc9f234d2d3b2404a2bfc92e4d9
Author: Robert (Bobby) Evans <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-10-01T18:00:51Z

    Updated RateTracker to be thread safe, more accurate, and very fast.  
removed subsampling of rate calculation in disruptor, because sub-sampling was 
more expensive than just doing the calculation.

----


> RateTracker.java is not thread safe
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1078
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: storm-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.0
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> The RateTracker class is not thread safe at all.  It may not be that big of a 
> deal, but the rates will be off if we notify from multiple threads, like we 
> do with disruptor.  It also has the potential to be way off if notify is 
> being called at the same time as updateSlides.  This would result in the new 
> bucket not being set to 0, but getting the old value that was there 
> previously.
> We want to be very careful that what we do does not impact the performance 
> too much.  So ideally no big locks but use AtomicLongs instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to