Github user jerrypeng commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/785#discussion_r42032492
  
    --- Diff: 
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/validation/ConfigValidationAnnotations.java 
---
    @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package backtype.storm.validation;
    +
    +import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
    +import java.lang.annotation.Target;
    +
    +import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
    +import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
    +
    +/**
    + * Note: every annotation interface must have method validatorClass()
    + * For every annotation there must validator class to do the validation
    + * To add another annotation for config validation, add another annotation 
@interface class.  Implement the corresponding
    + * validator logic in a class in ConfigValidation.  Make sure 
validateField method in ConfigValidation knows how to use the validator
    + * and which method definition/parameters to pass in based on what fields 
are in the annotation.
    + */
    +public class ConfigValidationAnnotations {
    +    /**
    +     * Field names for annotations
    +     */
    +
    +    static final String VALIDATOR_CLASS = "validatorClass";
    +    static final String TYPE = "type";
    +    static final String ENTRY_VALIDATOR_CLASSES = "entryValidatorClasses";
    +    static final String KEY_VALIDATOR_CLASSES = "keyValidatorClasses";
    +    static final String VALUE_VALIDATOR_CLASSES = "valueValidatorClasses";
    +    static final String KEY_TYPE = "keyType";
    +    static final String VALUE_TYPE = "valueType";
    +    static final String INCLUDE_ZERO = "includeZero";
    +
    +    /**
    +     * Validators with fields: validatorClass and type
    +     */
    +
    +    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    +    @Target(ElementType.FIELD)
    +    public @interface isType {
    +        Class validatorClass() default 
ConfigValidation.SimpleTypeValidator.class;
    +
    +        Class type();
    +    }
    +
    +    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    +    @Target(ElementType.FIELD)
    +    public @interface isStrings {
    --- End diff --
    
    ok how about isListOfStrings then? so to keep the "is" prefix consistent


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to