+1

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Cody Innowhere <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
> (sorry for previous mis-post, repost to this thread)
>
> I think programming languages as Clojure and Java is no gap for common
> developers, but it might be a problem for industrial users, who may not be
>  willing or have time to dive into the details of the Clojure core, and
> this is the great advantage of a Java core storm and will definitely
> attract more contributors to the community and improve the development of
> storm.
> Also, as JStorm describes, it has been tested in vast industrial use cases
> for stability and efficiency, if JStorm were merged into storm, it will
> surely make storm better & stronger.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:19 AM, 方孝健(玄弟) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Derek Dagit [mailto:[email protected]]
> > 发送时间: 2015年10月28日 1:56
> > 收件人: [email protected]
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Accept Alibaba JStorm Code Donation
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Derek
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:48 PM
> > Subject: [VOTE] Accept Alibaba JStorm Code Donation
> >
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > The IP Clearance process for the Alibaba JStorm code donation has
> > completed.
> >
> > The IP Clearance Status document can be found here:
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-jstorm.html
> >
> > The source code can be found at https://github.com/alibaba/jstorm with
> > the following git commit SHA: e935da91a897797dad56e24c4ffa57860ac91878
> >
> > This is a VOTE to accept the code donation, and import the donated code
> > into the Apache Storm git repository. Discussion regarding how to proceed
> > with merging the codebases can take place in separate thread.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Alibaba JStorm code donation.
> > [ ] +0 Indifferent
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the code donation because…
> >
> > This VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to