Hi Taylor,

 

Thanks for the merge plan. I have a question about “Phase 2.2”.

Do you mean community plan to create a fresh new “java core” based on current 
“clojure core” firstly, and then migrate the features from JStorm? 

If so, it confused me.  It is really a huge job which might require a long 
developing time to make it stable, while JStorm is already a stable version. 

The release planned to be release after Nov 11th has already run online stably 
several month in Alibaba. 

Besides this, there are many valuable internal requirements in Alibaba, the 
fast evolution of JStorm is forseeable in next few months. 

If the “java core” is totally fresh new, it might bring many problems for the 
coming merge.

So, from the point of this view,  I think it is much better and easier to 
migrate the features of “clojure core” basing on JStorm for the “java core”.

Please correct me, if any misunderstanding.

 

Regards

Basti

 

发件人: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2015年11月11日 5:32
收件人: dev@storm.apache.org
主题: [DISCUSS] Plan for Merging JStorm Code

 

Based on a number of discussions regarding merging the JStorm code, I’ve tried 
to distill the ideas presented and inserted some of my own. The result is below.

 

I’ve divided the plan into three phases, though they are not necessarily 
sequential — obviously some tasks can take place in parallel.

 

None of this is set in stone, just presented for discussion. Any and all 
comments are welcome.

 

-------

 

Phase 1 - Plan for 0.11.x Release

1. Determine feature set for 0.11.x and publish to wiki [1].

2. Announce feature-freeze for 0.11.x

3. Create 0.11.x branch from master (Phase 2.4 can begin.)

4. Release 0.11.0 (or whatever version # we want to use)

5. Bug fixes and subsequent releases from 0.11.x-branch

 

 

Phase 2 - Prepare for Merge ("master" and "jstorm-import" branches)

1. Determine/document unique features in JStorm (e.g. classpath isolation, 
cgroups, etc.) and create JIRA for migrating the feature.

2. Create JIRA for migrating each clojure component (or logical group of 
components) to Java. Assumes tests will be ported as well.

3. Discuss/establish style guide for Java coding conventions. Consider using 
Oracle’s or Google’s Java conventions as a base — they are both pretty solid.

4. align package names (e.g backtype.storm --> org.apache.storm / 
com.alibaba.jstorm --> org.apache.storm) (Phase 3 can begin)

 

 

Phase 3 - Migrate Clojure --> Java

1. Port code/tests to Java, leveraging existing JStorm code wherever possible 
(core functionality only, features distinct to JStorm migrated separately).

2. Port JStorm-specific features.

3. Begin releasing preview/beta versions.

4. Code cleanup (across the board) and refactoring using established coding 
conventions, and leveraging PMD/Checkstyle reports for reference. (Note: good 
oportunity for new contributors.)

5. Release 0.12.0 (or whatever version # we want to use) and lift feature 
freeze.

 

 

Notes:

We should consider bumping up to version 1.0 sometime soon and then switching 
to semantic versioning [3] from then on.

 

 

With the exception of package name alignment, the "jstorm-import" branch will 
largely be read-only throughout the process.

 

During migration, it's probably easiest to operate with two local clones of the 
Apache Storm repo: one for working (i.e. checked out to working branch) and one 
for reference/copying (i.e. checked out to "jstorm-import").

 

Feature-freeze probably only needs to be enforced against core functionality. 
Components under "external" can likely be exempt, but we should figure out a 
process for accepting and releasing new features during the migration.

 

Performance testing should be continuous throughout the process. Since we don't 
really have ASF infrastructure for performance testing, we will need a 
volunteer(s) to host and run the performance tests. Performance test results 
can be posted to the wiki [2]. It would probably be a good idea to establish a 
baseline with the 0.10.0 release.

 

I’ve attached an analysis document Sean Zhong put together a while back to the 
JStorm merge JIRA [4]. The analysis was against the 0.9.3 release but is still 
relevant and has a lot of good information.

 

 

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STORM/Release+0.11.0+Feature+Set

[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STORM/Storm+Home

[3] http://semver.org

[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-717

 

 

-Taylor

 

Reply via email to