Github user wuchong commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/877#discussion_r44742223
  
    --- Diff: STORM_JSTORM_FEATURE_DIFF.md ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
    + feature | Storm-0.11.0-SNAPSHOT (and expected pull requests) | 
JStorm-2.1.0 | Notes | JIRA |
    +----------|-----------------------|--------------|-------|----|
    + Security | Basic Authentication/Authorization | N/A | The migration is 
not high risk. But JStorm daeons/connections need to be evaluated
    +Scheduler | Resource aware scheduling      (Work In Progress) | 
<ol><li>Make the tasks of same component distributed evenly across the nodes in 
cluster.<li>Make number of tasks in a worker is balanced.<li>Try to assign two 
tasks which are transferring message directly into a same worker to reduce 
network cost.<li>Support user defined assignment and  to use the result of last 
assignment       Different solution between Storm and JStorm.</ol> Actually, 
JStorm has ever used cpu/mem/disk/network demond for scheduling. But we faced 
the problem of low utilization of cluster. For example, because the 
configuration of topologys and resources of hardwares in a cluster are 
different. After running a period, it is possible that no topology will be 
assigned to the node with enough other resources but just lacking one resource. 
| Scheduler interface is pluggable so we should be able to support boht 
schedulers for the time being |
    +Nimbus HA  | Support to configure more than one spare nimbus. When the 
master nimbus is down, a most appropriate spare nimbus(topologys in disk mostly 
matches the recoreds in zk) will be chosen to be promoted. | Different 
solution. | | 
    --- End diff --
    
    Seems that the Nimbus HA feature of storm and jstorm has been swapped. 
    Maybe it should be `Nimbus HA  |    | Support to configure more than one 
spare nimbus. When the master nimbus is down, a most appropriate spare 
nimbus(topologys in disk mostly matches the recoreds in zk) will be chosen to 
be promoted. | Different solution. | `


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to